LARGE PISTOL PRIMERS & PRIMER WADS IN BPCRs By Wayne McLerran
Last update: 5/20/15
Going back a few years, the general consensus was that a “strong” primer was required to reliably fire black powder. Hence, it was standard practice to use magnum rifle primers in BPCRs and the Federal GM215M Gold Medal Match Large Magnum rifle primer was very popular. More recently, due to experimenting by some well-know competitively successful shooters, it was found that lowering the power (brisance) of the primer can directly contributed to a significant reduction in the velocity extreme spread (ES) and standard deviation (SD). In many cases (no pun intended) the SDs dropped from double digits to low single digit values. I’m not aware of conclusive evidence as to why a weaker primer reduces SD. It’s been debated that a stronger primer can push the powder column and bullet forward prior to full powder ignition, resulting in shot-to-shot inconsistencies.
Large Pistol Primers One method in common practice today to reduce primer brisance is to use large pistol primers in place of large rifle primers. For a chart comparing the power of various primers go to http://www.castingstuff. com/primer_testing_reference.htm. Although the diameter is the same, large pistol primers are 0.008” shorter and the cup material is slightly softer than large rifle primers. In loads for most BPC rifles this works fine, but be on the lookout for the following potential problems: 1. Since rifle firing pins generally strike the primer with more velocity/energy than handgun firing pins, pierced primers can result. 2. If you’re not paying close attention when seating primers, the potential increases of not fully seating a large pistol primer and not realizing it. Althoughit’s not a dangerous situation, misfires can result since some of the firing pin energy is used to shove the primer forward rather than adequately indenting the primer. 3. If the primer is seated without a spacer to compensate for the difference and primer height and the firing pin tip protrusion is marginal, a misfire or “hang fire” can result. 4. If the primer is fully seated without a spacer and fired, cartridge/chamber pressures will drive it back into the breechblock face with more energy than a flush-seated large rifle primer. Although generally not a problem with modern hard breechblocks, the force may be sufficient to eventually “peen” the area around the firing pin opening of softer breechblocks found in some 19th century or early 20th century receivers.
Primer Wads Another method to reduce primer brisance is to place a thin paper wad over the primer. The wad can be made from newsprint, printer paper or similar material. The wad is positioned between the primer and the bottom of the primer pocket, and is referred to as an over-primer wad (OPW). Or a larger diameter wad, referred to as an under-powder wad (UPW), can be inserted in the case prior to loading with powder.
Over Primer Wads (OPWs): OPWs are typically used with and cut out by the large pistol primer during the primer seating step. Thin paper is inserted between the primer and the case as the primer is being seated. Seating the primer cuts and seats the wad, covering the flash hole. Since the paper takes up some room in the bottom of the primer hole, when fully seated the pistol primer is positioned further back, limiting the paper thickness to around 0.008”, which is the difference in height between a large rifle primer and a large pistol primer. When using large pistol primers some shooters use an OPW solely to eliminate the potential breechblock peening problems noted above. The wad thickness compensates for the shorter primer and also further reduces the brisance of the large pistol primer.
Under Powder Wads (UPWs): UPWs are normally punched out of paper and dropped into the case to cover the flash hole prior to loading powder. UPWs can be made with cheap hand-held punches or a press mounted punch used to make the much thicker over-powder wads. When inserting the UPW, if a problem is experienced with the wad flattening out against the inside wall of the case, a dowel rod or similar tool can be used to push the wad down or use slightly smaller diameter wads. Although the standard cheap hand-held paper punch found at most office supply retailers cuts a ¼” hole, they are available in other sizes. I’ve used both a 5/16” and 3/8” version for .40 and .45 caliber. These will usually drop in and “flutter down” to cover the much smaller primer hole. The wad does not have to be centered as long as the flash hole is fully covered.
One potential issue with UPWs is they may not be effective in taming the primer power. Based on recent testing I found it’s unlikely the primer will punch through the UPW, but will push the wad and powder column forward sufficient for the hot gases to be diverted around the edge of the wad and ignite the powder. Also, using 0.008” or thicker UPWs increases the chances of the wad remaining in the bore and obstructing the following shot. For more details and results from my testing see the article titled, BPCR Primer Wads Testing Results.
I understand that Steve Garbe discussed primer wads in an article in one of his 2002 editions of The Black Powder Cartridge News. Shooters have since experimented with various paper thicknesses and used other more durable material. Some use a combination of large pistol primers and primer wads to further reduce primer power. Primer wads also serve to keep powder granules from entering the primer hole and possibly causing erratic ignition. Some shooters believe this is more important than reducing the primer brisance. Although it’s been shown that primers will generally not blow through thick wads, the wad thickness could have an effect on standard deviations. Hence, additional experimenting may be required to determine the wad thickness or material that works best for your loads, or even if primer wads are beneficial.